Welcome to UKWelder
The News and Vacancy Website
 for the UK Welding Industry
Welding Caps Welding Helmets Pioner Overalls Welding Gloves
UKWelder Shop
Welding Hoods Welding Leathers Welding Helmet Spares Welding Boots

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> how do these welds look?
babubabu
post Sep 29 2004, 10:19 AM
Joined: 29-Sep 04



please comment.

http://ghettoracer.com/files/welding-sample-1.jpg

http://ghettoracer.com/files/welding-sample-2.jpg

http://ghettoracer.com/files/welding-sample-3.jpg

thanks.
Technic Al
post Sep 29 2004, 12:26 PM
Joined: 14-Oct 03



Is it an exhaust system
Stainless
Tig without a filler wire

I always find it difficult from a photo because there are no landmarks to judge sizes.

If it is what I think it is, ie an exhaust, it looks nice but will it be strong ?. I prefer to see reinforcement so that the weld is convex rather than concave. I think the tube to flange wont last long in service, the heat and vibration will see to it.

Hope i'm heading in the right direction, if not, can you post some details.
babubabu
post Sep 29 2004, 06:38 PM
Joined: 29-Sep 04



QUOTE (Technic Al @ Sep 29 2004, 01:26 PM)
Is it an exhaust system
Stainless
Tig without a filler wire

I always find it difficult from a photo because there are no landmarks to judge sizes.

If it is what I think it is, ie an exhaust, it looks nice but will it be strong ?. I prefer to see reinforcement so that the weld is convex rather than concave. I think the tube to flange wont last long in service, the heat and vibration will see to it.

Hope i'm heading in the right direction, if not, can you post some details.

yes it is a exhaust header/extractor 304 stainless 16 gauge. by reenforcement do you mean using a filler wire? the size of the welds are about 1 mm. the welds are done in asia and seems to be the style they prefer, they call it "fish scale". they try to keep the scale size similar in size and lay down in equal spacing. i had a usa welder comment on the little pimple in the middle of some of the scale causes a stress riser and will be where cracking propagates from. what are your thoughts?

thanks for you inputs.
bobthewelder
post Sep 29 2004, 06:47 PM
Joined: 12-Jul 04



Hello babubabu!...how are you?.....Me thinks this is a 4/8 cylinder jobby? The TIG welds look like you are on the right track but there are a few ways to improve them: 1st JPG looks like a 2 into 1 collector (assuming) "looks like you are using a pulse?? if so then the speed is to slow and weld is too cold! bump up the amps a bit (huge assumption that the gauge is around 1.2 poss 1.6mm) and increase the pulse rate and you will get rid of the shrinkage "pips" that you can see on every single tack( for want of a better word) I know that you are purging because i can see how well your gas cover is on the tight part......this will definately improve things, also mate try not to be so brutal with the tacking up of the collector it seems to be quite hot at the swagged end! and make sure to keep the purge behind this area as well.(I know it has to be bashed around to make it round but any lack of fusion here will result in failure under load.) 2nd JPG looks like the primaries to collector lap fillet joint....All you need to do is increase the amps because the welds are to cold again..dont worry about excess penatration! you can always turn up the pressure of your backing gas, this will allow you to put down a flatter fillet without the danger of restricting exhaust gas flow with excess pen from your weld..
3rd JPG is your primary flange joint fillet and again it looks to cold: When you weld these you will find that your tack up should be as tight as possible on the face. When the joint has been tapped in tight, weld the outside face complete (fuse it in without filler nice and neatly with enough heat to allow the weld to be flat...your flange will be at least 5mm thick (I hope) so there is no danger of any stray penatration falling in.....then weld the fillet with a backing purge, same rules apply with bumping the gas back pressure to avoid excess penatration. You must play around with the pulse until your settings are just right and you will love the results.....Goog luck BTW.. /'-)
tonyp
post Sep 29 2004, 10:00 PM
Joined: 5-Jan 04



"Fish Scale" never heard pulse welding called that before, if thats what its is. But it does look like filler is used but at too big an interval on drawing 2, plus there is a stop start on the far pipe which doesn't look very good but there is no stress on an exhaust so this would be no problem, the 3rd one is a good weld but would look better with filler wire.
Backpurge
post Sep 30 2004, 08:14 AM
Joined: 7-Jan 04



Hi Babubabu
Agree with most of the guys comments above, it looks as if either the pulse frequency is too slow or the travel speed is too high, the overlaps should be a lot closer together and the welds would definitely benefit from a bit more reinforcement.

Cheers Bob
Technic Al
post Sep 30 2004, 08:17 AM
Joined: 14-Oct 03



QUOTE (babubabu @ Sep 29 2004, 06:38 PM)

yes it is a exhaust header/extractor 304 stainless 16 gauge. by reenforcement do you mean using a filler wire? the size of the welds are about 1 mm. the welds are done in asia and seems to be the style they prefer, they call it "fish scale". they try to keep the scale size similar in size and lay down in equal spacing. i had a usa welder comment on the little pimple in the middle of some of the scale causes a stress riser and will be where cracking propagates from. what are your thoughts?

thanks for you inputs.

Any sudden change of thickness will be a stress raiser. Obviously, you need sufficient stress before it becomes a problem. Im not sure about the first two photos but the last one will probably create some movement causing fatigue. As you have 16 gauge tube I would expect the welds to be at least the same thickness.
The final photo of the tube to flange. Is it a mild steel or a cast steel / iron flange. If so you have a considerable difference in their expansion / contraction properties. Stainless expands under heat much more than mild steel. For an exhaust this is not good so I would want a bigger weld to cope with it.

Also 304 is not the best grade for an exhaust. Exhaust fumes contain Sulphur which corrodes the 304. It depends on how long you expect it to last but there is another grade (410) that will last longer.
rottenroot
post Sep 30 2004, 08:43 AM
Joined: 5-Mar 04



It's an exhaust, not a swiss watch !!!
Fit for purpose.....don't agree guys ??
The welding isn't fantastic but seen a lot worse + the companies producing these hang their hat on the "Guaranteed for life banner". If it falls off / fractures, etc you go back to where it came and get a new shiney one ;o)

what a laaarrffff
rgds
Technic Al
post Sep 30 2004, 09:29 AM
Joined: 14-Oct 03



QUOTE (rottenroot @ Sep 30 2004, 08:43 AM)
It's an exhaust, not a swiss watch !!!
Fit for purpose.....don't agree guys ??
The welding isn't fantastic but seen a lot worse + the companies producing these hang their hat on the "Guaranteed for life banner". If it falls off / fractures, etc you go back to where it came and get a new shiney one ;o)

what a laaarrffff
rgds

I was assuming that these are the guys giving the guarantee so I suspect they want them to last longer than the warranty

How many Swiss watches have you seen welded then ???
babubabu
post Sep 30 2004, 10:22 AM
Joined: 29-Sep 04



thanks everyone for the feedbacks. i really appreciate you taking the time. the flange for this piece is just mildsteel since it is a final prototype for fitment check. in production run we are using stainless 304 lostwax casted flanges.

typically the next grade use for stainless seems to be 321. i haven't read/heard much about use of 410 in usa/asia. is that commonly used in uk?

this header is for naturally aspirated engines so exhaust temp won't be all that high.
roger rough cap
post Sep 30 2004, 03:24 PM
Joined: 6-Feb 04



can't really give a comment on the welding but the photo's look nice
boilerman
post Sep 30 2004, 11:08 PM
Joined: 17-Jun 04



i don't know if engloid comes to this site ....but this is the addy of his site with pics of proper welds....enjoy
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/engloid/workpics/workpics.html
Halfloaf
post Dec 3 2004, 09:35 PM
Joined: 3-Dec 04



is that a d16 flange?
Engloid
post May 17 2005, 02:04 AM
Joined: 21-Apr 05



As an American Welding Society, Certified Welding Inspector....

I'd reject every weld there.

The dimple in the middle of each spot is called a "fisheye." It is actually a microscopic hole that can protrude all the way through the weld.

If they want to weld in a method like this, they should overlap each spot such that this hole is remelted by the next pulse, and therefore eleminated.

Bu pulsing like this, they are letting the part get very cool between pulses, and keeping the overall heat affected zone smaller...but they are sacrificing strength and penetration.

Keep in mind that they do these overseas for a reason....cause they're CHEAP!! They save a lot of money by not using filler metal. This money alone is likely enough to by far cover the cost of backing their warranty on the parts that fail...and that's if they even come through with the goods when the part fails.
gecko4
post May 17 2005, 09:02 PM
Joined: 17-May 05



mig over man its going under your car haha
squirmy rooter
post May 19 2005, 01:23 AM
Joined: 2-May 04



engloid here here spot on mate
smoke232323
post May 24 2005, 08:24 PM
Joined: 24-May 05



the man that said use 410 grade is spot on its high temprature steel and will sertainly cope with the expansion better plus a bit if filler wouldn't hurt
Engloid
post Jun 7 2005, 12:55 AM
Joined: 21-Apr 05



I'll add more to this about filler metals...

Typically, anywhere that a weldment will see physical stress, including heat, filler metal should be used.

the reason is that metal is a compound that consists of many things. When you weld, everybody knows that certain gasses, metals, and vapors are released into the air. Also, some elements will tend to rise to the surface. Either of these reduces the amount of that element in the metal after the weld. Filler metals are typically made such that they have higher percentages of these elements that will be released into the air or will rise to the surface. By not using filler metal, your weld can be weaker than the base material.

In some industries like food process or pharmaceutical piping. filler metal may not be used.. but remember that this is usually thin tube that only has to hold itself up in the air.
Go to the top of the page
Start new topicGo to the top of the page
Click on the Lion to return to the homepage Click on the Lion to return to the homepage